Prediction record

Missgeopolitics

By May 2023, Ukrainian air power with JDAMs will prove decisive — Ukraine able to strike targets within range with near-unrestricted air access.

A scored record for Peter Zeihan, made on .

VideoPrimary sourcegeopolitics

Scored record

Missgeopolitics

when we get past mud season into next May is going to prove crucial because all of a sudden you've got a country with unrestricted air access who can Target whatever they want anywhere within range

By May 2023, Ukrainian air power with JDAMs will prove decisive — Ukraine able to strike targets within range with near-unrestricted air access.

Made on
2022-12-19
Outcome
Miss
Importance
4 / 5
Contribution
-1.78

Criterion

Resolution status
resolved
Resolved on
2023-05-31

By/around May 2023, test whether JDAM-equipped Ukrainian air power becomes a decisive factor, enabling Ukraine to fly offensive missions and strike targets within range with largely unrestricted air access. Resolves false if Ukrainian air power remains constrained and non-decisive.

Criterion tests whether, by/around May 2023, JDAM-equipped Ukrainian air power became decisive with largely unrestricted air access; resolves false if Ukrainian air power remained constrained/non-decisive. JDAMs did arrive (~Mar 2023), but authoritative sources (RAND, USNI, Foreign Policy, USAF leadership) uniformly describe a contested/mutually-denied airspace through May 2023, with Russian GPS jamming degrading JDAM accuracy and S-300/S-400 SAMs forcing standoff/low-altitude release. Ukraine entered its summer counteroffensive without air superiority. Ukrainian air power was constrained and non-decisive in the window. resolved_on set to deadline. Final outcome value left to the quantify stage.

Sources

  • JDAMs: Ukrainian Bomb's Get Smarter

    YouTube ·

    Source

Outcome evidence

  • Ukrainian Pravda confirms Ukraine's Air Force began using JDAM 'smart' bombs by ~31 Mar 2023 — i.e., the munitions arrived within the prediction window, allowing a real test of the 'decisive by May 2023' claim.

    Evidence

  • RAND analysis: highly capable mutual air defenses denied air superiority to both sides in Ukraine; ground-based air defenses pushed manned aircraft to standoff distances, reducing effectiveness — Ukrainian air power remained constrained, not decisive, through this period.

    Evidence

  • USNI Proceedings ('Air Denial Lessons from Ukraine', Sep 2023) and contemporaneous reporting (Foreign Policy, 5 May 2023; USAF general, Mar 2023 'integrated air defense has made many aircraft worthless'): Ukraine could not achieve air superiority; by/through May 2023 its airspace remained contested and offensive air operations were sharply limited.

    Evidence

  • Reporting that Russian GPS jamming caused JDAMs to miss (reported 5 May 2023) and that JDAM-ER's range only protects the carrier aircraft at high altitudes where S-300V4/S-400 SAMs make them vulnerable — explaining why JDAM-equipped airpower did not deliver near-unrestricted air access in the window.

    Evidence

  • Ukraine launched its 2023 counteroffensive without air superiority ('not in the air force, not in drones, not in helicopters'), lacking close air support to breach fortifications — direct evidence Ukrainian air power was non-decisive around and after May 2023.

    Evidence

Corrections

No public corrections.

Score contribution

-1.78
Confidence
85%
Outcome
Miss
Importance
4 / 5
Contribution
-1.78

This page displays the scored record as published; the website doesn't recompute or adjust the score.

Provenance

By May 2023, Ukrainian air power with JDAMs will prove deci…
Methodology version
v1.0.0
Last computed
July 4, 2026
Made on
2022-12-19

How this profile was built

  1. Scored by independent judges

  2. Predictions gathered and sourced

  3. Independently verified against sources

Every public score traces back to sourced prediction records.

Avow is an independent project. The pundits scored here are not affiliated with Avow and do not endorse it. Names and likenesses are used for identification and commentary.

Evidence firstMethodology